Answer: Jorge Bergoglio.
It has been that way since early 2013. Since Jorge Bergoglio has no jurisdiction within the Catholic Church, everything he has done since 2013 under his “authority” is null and void. However, he does have authority within the Conciliar Church. He is morphing it from a heretical sect to an apostate one. I am in agreement with Fr. Paul Kramer that a formal schism is coming where Catholics will have to make a choice on which the salvation of their souls will depend: either follow the Catholic Church through the papal succession of Benedict XVI or follow the apostate sect through the succession of Jorge Bergoglio. I have already made my choice. What about you?
If Christ is the head of the true church is not lucifer the head of the conciliar church?
I mean the heads on earth.
Do you believe that both Benedict and Francis have uttered heretical or semi-heretical comments? Or only Francis?
Jorge Bergoglio = formal heretic
Joseph Ratzinger = not formal heretic
Your comments read as if you think formal schism has been here since 2013? Is this accurate? Yet Fr. Kramer says formal schism is coming. It is not clear what you both believe.
No. I did not write that. I wrote that Jorge Bergoglio has been the head of the Conciliar Church since early 2013. The formal schism is yet to come.
If you do not believe a “formal” schism has occurred, how do you account for two contenders (or claimants, if you will) to the papal throne these last nine years?
Because many of the Church hierarchy appointed by Benedict XVI, the true current pope, believe that Jorge Bergoglio is the pope of the Catholic Church. Therefore, they are in a material schism and not a formal schism.
just throwing it out here Tony. What IF Bergoglio does a 180, wherein the false church surfaces to the top, there is a formal schism and Francis changes his whole tune, reverses his stance etc.?
Jorge Bergoglio is not pope, so it doesn’t matter what he does.