“But for now, if the N.O. is all you have access to, by all means avail yourself.”
The above is a quote of Mark Docherty which can be found in the bottom link. Unfortunately, too many people who know that Jorge Bergoglio is an antipope accept the New Mass as a legitimate means of fulfilling one’s Sunday obligation. It does not. The New Mass Rite is not Catholic. It is a Protestantized rite that is not pleasing to God regardless of whether it is valid. I have linked to Mark’s posts in the past, but please do not for one second think that I agree with everything he writes. And the same goes for others (e.g., Ann Barnhardt, Dr. Edmund Mazza, etc.).
One day the Church will most solemnly condemn this New Mass Rite.
E. Considering what has been said, are we obliged in conscience to attend the Novus Ordo Missae?
If the Novus Ordo Missae is not truly Catholic, then it cannot oblige for one’s Sunday obligation. Many Catholics who do assist at it are unaware of its all pervasive degree of serious innovation and are exempt from guilt. However, any Catholic who is aware of its harm, does not have the right to participate. He could only then assist at it by a mere physical presence without positively taking part in it, and then and for major family reasons (weddings, funerals, etc).
http://archives.sspx.org/SSPX_FAQs/q5_novus_ordo_missae.htm
So what should we do? One cannot place oneself in communion with an antipope in the una cum? Be it sspx, resistance; almost all do this. Over here there’s only one priest who doesnt (NO).
Fr. Paul Kramer does not agree with you that one cannot attend una cum Masses because those priests are not necessarily in a formal schism.
I know a lot of people who attend out of motive of REPARATION. As the Mass is valid – REALIS PRESENTIA – they don’t want to leave Our Lord alone amongst the thieves.
No motive is morally acceptable for actively assisting at the Novus Ordo Mass.