2 thoughts on ““False Pope Creating a False Church Because Good Catholics Will Not Stop Him””
maybe remotely related to this post, and more to previous ones, but:
In the new (authoritative) Credo of Bish. Schneider, he states that (A) a pope is only free of error in an infallible ex cathedra teaching (p. 93), so (B) he could err in his teaching that is not ex cathedra. Then he mentiones a few popes (p. 95) that did err in their non-ex-c teachings.
However, does B follow from A? That a teaching is ex cathedra means is it thereafter certain/de fide, and non-ex-c teachings are not. But “not certain” is not the same as “potentially in error”, is it?
In other words: how does Mgr Schneider relate to the list of Dr. Mazaa which implies that Tradition does not in any way limit ‘free of error’ to ‘ex cathedra’. https://www.edmundmazza.com/2023/07/04/if-francis-is-pope/
maybe remotely related to this post, and more to previous ones, but:
In the new (authoritative) Credo of Bish. Schneider, he states that (A) a pope is only free of error in an infallible ex cathedra teaching (p. 93), so (B) he could err in his teaching that is not ex cathedra. Then he mentiones a few popes (p. 95) that did err in their non-ex-c teachings.
However, does B follow from A? That a teaching is ex cathedra means is it thereafter certain/de fide, and non-ex-c teachings are not. But “not certain” is not the same as “potentially in error”, is it?
In other words: how does Mgr Schneider relate to the list of Dr. Mazaa which implies that Tradition does not in any way limit ‘free of error’ to ‘ex cathedra’.
https://www.edmundmazza.com/2023/07/04/if-francis-is-pope/
can you help me out?
Premise A is false. A [ope is free of error in a teaching of the Ordinary and Universal Magisterium in addition to ex cathedra teachings.