1 thought on “A proposito del libro “Habemus papam?” / Viglione risponde al professor de Mattei”

  1. Not sure how familiar with the Resistance Viglione actually is, but it would have been nice had he, in the course of rebutting de Mattei’s contention that his position puts him in the same orbit with the sedeprivationists and Resistance as schismatics, mentioned that, while the former may be non una cum, the latter is not.


Leave a Comment