6 thoughts on “Rewind – Antipope Bergoglio Will Provoke the Schism”
Does this website adhere to what Fr. Kramer preaches: that there was no schismatic church before Bergoglio?
Or what Archbishop Lefebvre of the SSPX preached that since the changes under Paul 6 there is a unique conciliar & schismatic church that is not the true church?
At the end if the day Fr. Kramer’s position is that, between 1958 (or 1962) and 2013, the visible hierarchical church comprised of two churches, one true, and one false, with a valid pope as head of both.
The awful “Fiducia Supplicans” falls right in line with what he predicted, but is perhaps only a small taste of coming attractions. We should prayerfully brace ourselves for many massive upheavals, which could include changing the words of consecration at Mass.
The key to perservering against these enormous stumbling blocks will be to comprehend the distinction between Catholic Church and Antichurch. Those who mistake the latter for the former will almost certainly succumb to scandal, and it will have been their own fault, borne from their unwillingness to research the topic or listen to those who’ve explained it. As usual, ignorance will not be an excuse.
Does this website adhere to what Fr. Kramer preaches: that there was no schismatic church before Bergoglio?
Or what Archbishop Lefebvre of the SSPX preached that since the changes under Paul 6 there is a unique conciliar & schismatic church that is not the true church?
Fr. Paul Kramer adheres to the position of Archbishop Lefebvre on this subject.
At the end if the day Fr. Kramer’s position is that, between 1958 (or 1962) and 2013, the visible hierarchical church comprised of two churches, one true, and one false, with a valid pope as head of both.
Correct.
The awful “Fiducia Supplicans” falls right in line with what he predicted, but is perhaps only a small taste of coming attractions. We should prayerfully brace ourselves for many massive upheavals, which could include changing the words of consecration at Mass.
The key to perservering against these enormous stumbling blocks will be to comprehend the distinction between Catholic Church and Antichurch. Those who mistake the latter for the former will almost certainly succumb to scandal, and it will have been their own fault, borne from their unwillingness to research the topic or listen to those who’ve explained it. As usual, ignorance will not be an excuse.
Sad to say, many in the mainstream SSPX can’t distinguish between the Church and the Antichurch, and I pity them for that.