6 thoughts on “SSPX Supports Vatican Charge that Archbishop Viganò is “Schismatic””

  1. It certainly is coming! Whatever schism you want to call it, material or formal, it’s a crime against God. To WILLINGLY recognize Bergoglio as pope because people rather do that for fear of be called “a sedevacantist” is cowardice. Either way, the SSPX at this point are traditional in name only (TINOS), and completely blind, or deceitful.

    Anyhow, thanks for the great posts, Tony

    Reply
      • With all due respect if schism itself is greater than heresy because it’s a sin against charity, it would be one thing to be in material schism UNKNOWINGLY and I can absolutely see how that wouldn’t be a sin or a crime, but to be in material schism KNOWINGLY, that’s exactly how we view mortal sin: full consent of the will. I think that’s also common sense, my friend. I think you focus way too much on the terminology when the basic Ten Commandments are at play here.

        Reply
  2. What in the world is wrong with the “new” SSPX? If Marcel the Great were alive today he would boldly be on the same side as Vigano. Yet, Fellay and company have not only turned modernist but are actually in real schism per canon 751 for recognizing this fake pontificate and trying to come into some sort of communion with a counterfeit church. Give me an absolute break. To call us “sedevacantists” is a form of actual manipulation and gaslighting! It’s meant as a grooming tactic to make the sheep shut up and continue following the hireling. Please wake up, Church Militant. Be saints, do your first Saturday devotions, pray for the consecration of Russia by a valid successor of Papa Ratzinger, and love LOVE the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

    Reply
    • The SSPX is in a material schism. The formal schism is coming. They will have to make their choice on who to follow.

      Reply

Leave a Comment