I do not have dogmatic certitude that all the conciliar popes were true popes. I hold them as suspect of heresy but not as public manifest formal heretics. As regards to doubt, I do not hold that there is a positive and probable doubt that the conciliar popes were true popes. Nevertheless, today we are in a situation where there is at least a positive and probable doubt that Jorge Bergoglio is a true pope.
It was not Francis who founded the counterfeit church, but Roncalli and Montini at Vatican II.
There seems to be a conscious attempt of the Bennyvacantists to avoid that reality and fixate on Francis.
He may be the most flagrant promoter, but only because his predecessors sought to disguise their subversion
I do not have dogmatic certitude that all the conciliar popes were true popes. I hold them as suspect of heresy but not as public manifest formal heretics. As regards to doubt, I do not hold that there is a positive and probable doubt that the conciliar popes were true popes. Nevertheless, today we are in a situation where there is at least a positive and probable doubt that Jorge Bergoglio is a true pope.
I also feel the same.